Is the penalty for driving without an interlock device more severe than for driving with a revoked license?

The correct answer is that the penalty for driving without an interlock device is not more severe than for driving with a revoked license, as both can carry substantial repercussions but often involve different contexts and legal considerations.

When a driver is required to have an interlock device, it is generally due to a prior conviction related to driving while intoxicated. The purpose of the interlock device is to prevent further offenses by ensuring the driver has not consumed alcohol before operating a vehicle. Failing to install or use an interlock device when required typically results in penalties, which can include fines or extended license revocation.

Conversely, driving with a revoked license is a serious offense, as it indicates that a driver has lost the legal right to operate a vehicle, often due to various traffic violations or criminal behavior. Penalties for this offense can also include fines, points on the driving record, and potential jail time, depending on state laws.

While both infractions are serious and can lead to legal consequences, jurisdictions often evaluate them with different frameworks. In many legal systems, the enforcement of penalties for driving on a revoked license can often lead to more severe overall legal implications compared to the penalties associated with not having an interlock device. Therefore, the answer correctly points out